Abstract
The interplay between males and females over reproduction can ultimately lead to the evolution of spectacular diversity in reproductive behaviour, morphology and physiology. This can range from the stunning peacock s tail to elaborate and bizzare penis morphology. The interactions are particularly strong when females mate with multiple males (polyandry) and when there is internal fertilization and sperm storage for long periods within females. This is because there are then frequent, intense and continuing competitions between males for matings and for fertilizations even after matings have occurred. In the last few decades it has been realized that interactions between females and males can often be antagonistic rather than co-operative. This sexual conflict occurs because each sex can increase their reproductive success in a way that can result in the expression of costs in the other sex. It is often the case, for example, that males but not females increase their reproductive success through increasing their mating frequency. When this happens, changes in one sex lead to counter changes in the other, as in an arms race. This continual back and forth between males and females, otherwise known as antagonistic coevolution , is a widespread and potent force for driving evolutionary change. Because its effects are focussed on changes to reproductive genes it can lead to reproductive incompatibilities. This can then lead to the creation of new species. Therefore, sexual conflict is important because it represents a potent and eternal fuel for generating biodiversity through increasing variation in genes and ultimately the number of species. Sexual conflict should be particularly strong when relatively minor differences in phenomena such as how often to mate result in large effects on the reproductive success of males in comparison to females. This will be particularly intense in the typical situation in which more than one male is involved in a reproductive bout with a single female (the eternal triangle where one females mates with two or more males in series). Hence there can often be three- (or more) way disagreements about reproductive decisions such as how often to mate, since the interests of the two males are served by very different outcomes. For example, the first male to mate would benefit if females never mated again. Although we currently have predictions, we lack actual measurements of the extent of these evolutionary disagreements and we also lack any understanding of the underlying mechanisms. This is therefore an important gap to fill. Our first aim is therefore to work with the fruitfly and measure for the first time the magnitude of disagreements in (i) normal flies and (ii) in those in which the sex peptide (SP) pathway - which we know mediates sexual conflict - has been manipulated in both sexes. We will use natural and engineered versions of SP pathway genes, to fully pin down their causal effects. Our supporting background work shows that in principle this is a valid and promising way to proceed. Our work provides proof of principle (a) that there are differences in reproductive success for normal males and females within eternal triangles, and (b) that inactivation of sex peptide receptor (SPR) in females significantly alters the patterns seen, party through changes in how the sperm of different males are stored and used for fertilisation. The latter could increase the chance of reproductive failure for males. Our second aim is therefore to test how sexual conflict within the eternal triangle could lead to reproductive isolation via a break down in competitions between sperm. Overall, the research work will show the extent, basis and significance of evolutionary disagreements over reproductive decisions in males and females that can drive evolutionary change, and their potential contribution to reproductive isolation and the generation of biodiversity.
United Kingdom